Different bidders couldn’t sustain with Kim Kardashian at Sotheby’s London on Wednesday evening (18 January), the place a consultant for the truth tv famous person and entrepreneur positioned the profitable bid on a scintillating amethyst cross that was beforehand worn by Princess Diana. The value, with charges, got here to £163,800, effectively above the pre-sale estimate of £80,000 to £120,000 Sotheby’s had given the jewel, often known as the Attalah cross, which was the star attraction in its Royal and Noble sale.
The cross-shaped pendant, which was created by jewellers Garrard within the Nineteen Twenties, is believed to be a singular piece, with 5.25-carat diamonds framing giant amethyst stones, all organized in a fleurée (or floral) type. Diana most famously wore the eye-catching jewel to a fundraising gala for the Birthright charity in 1987, pairing it with a complementary purple gown designed by Catherine Walker. She wore the cross on a number of different events, in keeping with Sotheby’s, largely for personal occasions.
The cross was being provided at Sotheby’s from the property of Naim Attallah (1931-2021), the Palestinian British businessman, writer and former chief govt of Asprey & Garrard. The spectacular end result underscores the rising significance for Sotheby’s (and rival Christie’s) of the jewelry, luxurious and memorabilia classes.
The dazzling Attalah cross stands in dramatic distinction to the latest aesthetic inclinations of Kardashian’s ex-husband Ye (previously Kanye West)—the house the couple as soon as shared prominently options a pristine, white slashed canvas by Lucio Fontana. Extra not too long ago, she has posed with a pink-hued James Turrell work that could be a greater match for her newly acquired jewel.
“We’re delighted that this piece has discovered a brand new lease of life throughout the fingers of one other globally well-known identify,” Sotheby’s head of jewelry in London, Kristian Spofforth, mentioned in a press release. “It is a daring piece of jewelry by its dimension, color and elegance which can’t fail to make a vibrant assertion, whether or not it’s of religion or vogue—or certainly each.”