[ad_1]
The criticism, filed Tuesday, alleges Daniel Friedberg served as a “fixer,” paying “exorbitant hush cash” to would-be whistleblowers who threatened to reveal the alternate’s alleged misappropriation of person funds. He faces 11 expenses, together with authorized malpractice, breach of fiduciary obligation, company waste and several other counts of fraudulent transfers, in line with the lawsuit.
[ad_2]
Source link
